
A paper presented by Antares at Sidang Seni 2001, Galeri Petronas’ first annual conference on the arts, March 24-25, 2001

Then, as now, the shaman-artist served as a visionary of the sacred, a medium connecting the various dimensions, a transducer of spirit into matter and vice versa, a vital link between metaphysical and physical. His ability to merge the inner world of dreams and symbols with the outer world of the hunt made him a healer and a seer, gifted with initiatic and prophetic authority.


Interestingly, this idea of earthly existence as a shadow-play is the central metaphor in Plato’s famous Allegory of the Cave, wherein he describes the unawakened consciousness as a prisoner chained in darkness, kept enthralled by an illusory pageant of animated shadows enacted by an invisible priesthood. Precisely the technique employed in the Wayang Kulit tradition, still practised in former colonies of the Majapahit Empire.

From Plato’s Cave to Wayang Kulit to the Magic Lantern and George Lucas’s Industrial Light Magic is a mere progression of technological sophistication. A father amusing his child by creating animated shadows with his hands is drawing on a very ancient artform.




Commercialism and industrialism now threaten, alas, to turn Art into just another economic activity – and the Artist’s ceremonial and magical rôle into a purely ornamental one.

AT THIS JUNCTURE, we must examine the complex interactions between the inner and outer self of the artist. Paradoxically, what begins as a unique experience ultimately transforms itself into a universal truth through the exercise of the artistic imagination and will.

The word technology itself derives from technique – which may be classified as “hardware and software” in modern parlance. Tools are hardware and, as such, are utterly useless unless one is also equipped with the necessary knowhow, the software. A simple case in point can be seen in the evolution of writing utensils - from chisel or quill or brush to chalk or crayon or ink pen; from manual to electric typewriter, to electronic word processor – all in the course of a mere 6,000 years.
And yet, the use of a high-powered computer does not provide any creative edge over the use of a goose quill. Would Shakespeare or Mozart, for instance, have done more inspired work if they had had access to “better” tools? Indeed the sonnets and plays of Shakespeare have survived the centuries better written in ink on parchment than they would have as digital code on magnetic disks – just as Mozart’s masterpieces have better lasted the centuries on paper than they would have on acetate or vinyl or optical disk.

Perhaps a digression is in order here: when politicians speak of “Smart Schools” they invariably have an image of students being plugged into a network of expensive computers. The big budgets are reserved for the acquisition of high-tech hardware rather than human software (in terms of dedicated and conscientious and innovative educators). This is a classic case of putting the cart before the horse, of valuing packaging above content, of idolizing form devoid of spirit, of exalting style above substance.

The unfortunate fact is that, in the last 500 years, businessmen and bureaucrats have quietly forged themselves into a freemasonry of secular authority – wresting control of human destiny from the sacred visionaries, the healers and the seers, the artists and philosophers.

This is the great quandary in which the modern world finds itself. Industrial society’s pursuit of Quantity has blinded it to Quality; the entrepreneur-merchant’s quest for and obeisance to the “lowest common denominator” makes him favor the numerous above the numinous, the secular above the sacred.

Democracy is misconstrued as being allowed to choose from a wide range of political candidates or consumer products.
The ancient nobility has been rudely supplanted by a clamorous cadre of status-seekers who have no qualms about using ignoble means to achieve their myopic ends. A newly ascended plutocracy of soulless materialism appears to have usurped the traditional aristocracy of spiritual values.

Perhaps this was an inevitable development. The artist-shaman is acutely individualistic and on the human level is more prone to ruinous competitiveness than any athlete or warrior. Could it be that the golden age when art and philosophy reigned triumphant abruptly ended when artists and philosophers became too isolated in their ivory towers and lost direct contact with the grassroots? Is that why there has been a pronounced swing towards community arts as a new context in which the artist can once again feel connected with his or her tribe? Contributing positively towards greater cohesion and healing is possibly the most creative option available to the artist-shaman at this point in evolution.

Hindu mythology offers us a helpful metaphor by postulating the archetypal trinity of Creator-Destroyer-Preserver – Brahma, Shiva and Vishnu. The dynamic principle of 3 defines many processes, even in the atomic world of nuclei, electrons and protons.

The conclusion we may draw from this is that our greatest hope now resides in the upcoming generation: whether it has the ability and agility to avoid growing up like the corrupt and morally bankrupt Father and propel itself an octave higher in aesthetical and ethical awareness, attaining the mystical baraka or Heaven’s Grace - and regaining thereby the artistic key to a new paradigm of paradise on earth.
Antares © March 2001
“Art is a means of connecting two worlds, the visible and the invisible, the physical and the spiritual. The area of our consciousness where culture has its roots lies in the uncontrolled mind of every individual: in the moment when it is given space to make a creative leap. Artists, scientists and spiritual masters alike have great respect for that particular faculty of our human potential. It is in the realization of each individual’s intuitive creativity that everybody would agree with the statement, everyone is an artist." ~ Louwrien Wijers
“art as awakened warriorship... art as a dynamic agent of planetary transformation... art as a foundation for global peace...” ~ José Argüelles
“Culture is shared meaning in which everybody participates.” ~ David Böhm
“Our true capital is our creativity.” ~ Joseph Beuys
"It's far too late for anything but magick, as the future is clearly up for grabs." ~ Antero Alli
[First posted 4 October 2008, reposted 26 February 2017]
5 comments:
Antares,
Thanks a million for this very profoundly powerful take on a topic that few would dare to tread.I read it MANY times to fully absorb the manifest and latent messages and to savor and relish the beauty of the words and thoughts that you have woven together so skilfully. Together with you, I mourn the death of true art form so aptly discussed in the part where you lamented the quandary where quantity has murdered quality. You are right...there is hardly anything wrong with this world....except the software!
Personally, I doubt that artists like Mozart, Shakespeare or Money would have created such splendid works if they had the 'better' tools we have today cos the latter would have squashed their creativity birthed from within and would also have conditioned them to think within the box.
I find this post especially meaningful because I went through the journey of self-discovery where my artistic skills are concerned...for the greater part of my life, I could not draw till I went for a pencil sketching course and the teacher, Mr. Tan Lye Hoe, a famous artist from Penang, convinced me that truly, everyone is an artist...and it is how we see that world that makes the difference in the works of art we produce.
Your observation here "As human consciousness becomes more engrossed with density, darkness and discontent, the urge to destroy grows more compelling than the urge to create" is spot on.
May the current and future generation take on the role of the 'Child' to preserve and to restore what others have chosen to destroy.
Thanks again for this beautiful post.
cheers
Antares,
My apologies for the typo error in the second para of my comment. I meant 'Monet' and not Money haha!
*blush*
cheers
Masterwordsmith my dear, let's envisage my inheriting a vast fortune so that I can immediately put you on a retainer just to leave encouraging comments on my blog! This paper was supposed to have been published along with others by Galeri Petronas shortly after the first conference on the arts in March 2001 - but I doubt it ever materialized. I'm glad at least ONE reader found it stimulating and saw fit to say so :-)
After all, it would be so dreadful if all we ever blogged about was local politics :-(
Yes, it would be dreadful indeed!(continuing the thought on politics)
I loved this post - that talked about so much, while seeming to only talk of art! Did you give this talk? Or was this just a paper?
I would love to be an artist! But alas I cannot draw or paint or whatever - though I am sure there is a masterpiece lurking inside me! Hahahah. I wish I'd met Paula's Mr Tan - to awake this artist in me!
I love Australian aboriginal art - there is something so very beautiful in it: the earth tones contrasted against white and black - so stark and yet so complex and beautiful! I have yet to see a piece I do not like.
And this last one, of the hand print. I especially love this. Who is the artist? Not that it matters. It's magnificent.
Good stuff.
Pat
Excellent post Antares. penetrating insight.
masterymistery at cosmic rapture
Post a Comment