Wednesday, May 9, 2012

The medical profession is seriously against vibrant health!



In the last 100 years dozens of doctors, scientists and researchers have come up with the most diverse, apparently effective solutions against cancer, but none of these was ever taken into serious consideration by official medicine.

Most of them were in fact rejected out-front, even though healings were claimed in the thousands, their proposers often being labeled as charlatans, ostracized by the medical community and ultimately forced to leave the country.

At the same time more than 20,000 people die of cancer every day, without official medicine being able to offer a true sense of hope to those affected by it. Why?

[Brought to my attention by Kate Daniels]

RUN FROM THE CURE ~ The Rick Simpson Story

5 comments:

cram said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw

Ping said...

Yes, lobbying by tobacco company. However do give this a read http://www.ahyap.com/blog/cancer.php.

Weakpedia said...

Antares, do you trust Wikipedia?

Essiac: "Essiac's purported effect on cancer has been reviewed by several major medical and scientific bodies, including the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,[3] the National Cancer Institute,[2] and the American Cancer Society.[4] All have found no evidence that essiac has any effect against cancer. The U.S. FDA described essiac as a "Fake Cancer 'Cure' Consumers Should Avoid".[3] Researchers at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center wrote that essiac "has not been shown to treat or prevent cancer" and that its use should be avoided"

Hoxsey Therapy: "In 1967, Hoxsey developed prostate cancer, and his own treatment failed to cure it. Because he failed to respond to his eponymous therapy, Hoxsey underwent surgery and standard medical treatment.[16] He died seven years later, in 1974."

Antares said...

@cram - Thanks for the link, I've added it to the post for easier access.

@weakpedia - There are different levels of knowledge. On the surface Wikipedia, like the Britannica, does a great job of providing the gist of things. However, if you try to research controversial events like 9/11 or Dov S. Zakheim (one of the main masterminds behind the false flag operation) you'll quickly hit a stone wall. Wikipedia serves well as a general source of info - but it studiously avoids offending the Zionist-Illuminati banking cartel, for example. And Big Pharma, along with the FDA and National Cancer Institute are definitely part of the Mammon-worshiping plutocratic power structure.

Weakpedia said...

But what are your views on the snippets re: Essaiac & Hoxsey? Sounds credible?